Article URL: http://oldvcr.blogspot.com/2026/08/mklinux-and-pimped-out-apple-workgroup.html Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49140702 Points: 43 # Comments: 2
But first we're going to have to rebuild it. And these plastics definitely don't want to stay in one piece.
Before we get into that, however, I've previously talked at length about Apple's early 1990s server strategy as it pertained to how the Apple Network Server ended up running IBM AIX, though not much about why CEO John Sculley's Apple embarked on a server line in the first place. Likewise, we've said very little about the parallel evolution of the Workgroup Servers and their relationship to the core Macintosh product line. Let's consider those topics now.
While the LaserWriter started at $6995 [$21,750 in 2026 dollars], the refreshed Lisa, er, Macintosh XL now started at a surprisingly competitive $3995 [$12,450], some $6000 less. However, the dirty little secret was that the Macintosh XL was only supposed to be a stopgap, a way to both slowly wind down the hardware and also buy time pending the real Macintosh Office centrepiece: Jobs' new leap forward, the "Big Mac." Big Mac had many vague ideas associated with it, though most of them converged on it being a file server or high-end workstation running some sort of Unix, possibly with the Macintosh interface layered on top. As such, being the most powerful machine in the constellation, it couldn't help but be fated for a central role in the new Macintosh Office. Later in design it was also internally known as the "3M" project, because it would generate at least a megapixel display (its most famous surviving mockup even put it in portrait orientation), provide at least a megabyte of memory, and run at least a million instructions per second on the new 68020.
Unfortunately for John Sculley, the company grossly underestimated the XL's appeal at its new lower price. What Apple expected to sell in eighteen months sold in three, emptying the parts inventory so rapidly that Sculley was forced to end its availability in April with Big Mac and its software still stuck in development. ("Apple's strategy may have been too good," mused InfoWorld.) Neither could Apple keep up with demand for the LaserWriter, becoming deeply backordered from manufacturing delays and only shipping 2,500 printers by June. Third-party products ended up filling the gaps, including networking hardware from 3Com and the Centram TOPS file sharing suite. Meanwhile, the Apple board, increasingly concerned about Jobs' excesses in his dual role, ordered Sculley to contain him, after which Jobs was cashiered in May and departed in September. Now in practical ruins, even though Apple promised all shipping products would remain available, the Macintosh Office initiative was officially shut down the same month.
The legacy of Big Mac nevertheless persisted in the Macintosh II's development, which at one point was even codenamed "Little Big Mac," and AppleShare's tardy arrival in January 1987 finally made a basic server platform possible. At launch AppleShare was targeted at any Macintosh Plus with sufficient external storage, though in initial versions a machine chosen for server duty had to be all but completely dedicated to the task. Introduced in March, the Mac II, compatible with the new AppleShare as well, would subsequently go on to largely achieve the 3M project's aims.
Although A/UX 1.0's Toolbox had no MultiFinder support and could only run one GUI application at a time — and only about five to ten percent of existing Macintosh applications — the new operating system still achieved its greater purpose: credible entry to the high-end workstation market and new interest from government and educational customers who needed a Unix-based option, yet still keeping much of the Mac's secret sauce. "In terms of broadening the Unix platform," Sculley intoned at its introduction, "useability is probably even more important." Users generally agreed, though it was necessary to reboot back into System 6 to run most Mac applications, and developers objected to the A/UX Toolbox's front-end limitations and un-Mac-like programming interface when building hybrid apps. While System 7's impending development continued in the background, Apple added X11 support as an option in part to address these and other deficiencies in the graphical interface. "Our first goal was to do a solid Unix," argued Michael J. Homer, technical markets director.
A/UX 2.0, introduced in 1990 before System 7's rollout, made good on the majority of Apple's promises: most 32-bit clean applications could now run under a new compatibility layer, MultiFinder was supported, and Macintosh, command line and X11 applications were finally able to coexist on one screen. It was exceptionally well-received by reviewers and users alike, with MacUser approvingly calling it "the most interesting and impressive software to have come out of Apple since HyperCard." Subsequently in July 1991, after System 7's May launch, Apple and IBM announced their new partnership around the PowerPC and a future AIX incorporating the Mac Toolbox. In November this idea was broadened into the future A/UX 4.0, with Apple introducing the System 7-based A/UX 3.0 at the same time. (Another, less-well-known alternative also emerged around this period, but we'll talk about that later when we discuss the history of MkLinux.)
As such, Apple management concluded their persistent lack of a turnkey server configuration was harming additional institutional uptake. At Mactivity '92, the Enterprise Systems Division (what would become Apple's Server Group) quizzed attendees for desired features; respondents nearly unanimously favoured high-end hardware on a Unix platform. Fortunately, Apple now credibly had one. In March 1993 the company announced the first Macintoshes to officially be called servers: the Workgroup Server 60, Workgroup Server 80, and Workgroup Server 95.
